Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01351
Original file (BC 2014 01351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01351
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, reflect the following:

      He served as a Military Training Instructor; and 
      
      Award of the Air Force Basic Military Training Instructor 
(BMTI) Ribbon.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served as a Military Training Instructor (MTI) between Jun 
82 and May 85.  There was no service ribbon at the time; however, 
he would like his records to reflect that he served as an MTI and 
was awarded the BMTI service ribbon.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 18 Mar 77, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.

On 28 Feb 95, the applicant received an honorable discharge.  He 
was credited with 17 years, 11 months and 13 days of active 
service.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  While the applicant served as a 
BMTI, he was not serving on active duty as of the award 
establishment date (7 Dec 98) in order to qualify for retroactive 
eligibility of the Air Force BMTI Ribbon therefore; he is 
ineligible for the award.

The BMTI Ribbon, established on 7 Dec 98, is awarded to Air Force 
active duty, Reserve, and Guard personnel to acknowledge past, 
present, and future BMTIs.  BMTIs (SDI 8B000) at Air Force BMT and 
Air Force Officer Training School are eligible, both past and 
present, if they were on duty on or after 7 Dec 98.  The basic 
award is presented upon graduation from MTI School, and wear of 
the ribbon becomes permanent after successful completion of at 
least 12 months tour of duty as an MTI.  The Commander may waive 
the minimum qualifying tour length if a member cannot complete the 
tour for a valid reason.  They may also withdraw authorization to 
wear the ribbon for those who are eliminated from the MTI program 
for disciplinary reasons.  The authorization to wear the ribbon is 
retroactive for any member who has successfully completed 12 
months duty as an MTI and is currently on active duty or a member 
of the Reserve/Guard component as of 7 Dec 98.  Technical school 
training instructors are not eligible for this ribbon.  An Oak 
Leaf Cluster is awarded for an additional three years of MTI duty 
following the basic tour of 3 (prior to 21 Nov 94) or 4 years (on 
or after 21 Nov 94).  

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 11 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01351 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 1 Aug 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Aug 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01030

    Original file (BC-2012-01030.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She served as a Military Training Instructor (MTI) from 4 Oct 1974 to 15 Dec 1976. The ribbon is intended for MTIs, (AFSC 8BOOO), at Air Force Basic Military Training and Air Force Officer Training School. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04956

    Original file (BC-2012-04956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 Aug 69, SAF authorized the AFOEA to recognize the achievements and accomplishments of USAF organizations or activities. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the AFOEA, indicating they were unable to verify the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01003

    Original file (BC-2003-01003.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01003 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Military Training Instructor (MTI) Ribbon be added to his record. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial of the applicant’s request, stating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03737

    Original file (BC 2013 03737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFGCM is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service or for a one-year period of service during a time of war. Service members who earned the medal during the first qualifying period and who again became entitled to the medal wear a bronze star on the ribbon to denote the second award of the medal. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant award of the VSM, VCM,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02691

    Original file (BC 2013 02691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02691 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED FORMER MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His deceased father’s record be corrected to reflect he was retroactively awarded the following awards: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01354

    Original file (BC 2014 01354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01354 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon – Short Tour (AFOR-ST). The AFTR was established on 12 Oct 80, and is awarded to members who, after 14 Aug 74, complete an initial Air Force accession training program. Insufficient...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803398

    Original file (9803398.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following are documented omissions from his personnel records and Officer Selection Brief (OSB) at the time of the CY98B lieutenant colonel board: 1) Overseas Long Tour at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany: Jan 84- Jan 87. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Reports & Queries Section, HQ AFPC/DPAPS1, states, with respect to the applicant’s duty history, that they have reviewed the applicant’s source document Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) and AF Forms...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101556

    Original file (0101556.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Both trainee and military training instructor (MTI) accounts indicate that by the third water stop, AB S-- and other trainees were receiving assistance from fellow trainees at various times during the march. Further, it is not designed for BMT trainees, cannot be used to make a determination regarding trainee activities, and does not contain sufficient objective criteria to assess an event like the march. d. The 10 Sep 98 march followed the limited guidance then existing for the conduct of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01461

    Original file (BC 2014 01461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he is now on the Military Rites Honorary Team for Burial in Miami, IN and he needs to wear his ribbons when performing his duties. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial for award...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...